Search for: "People v. Grant"
Results 3021 - 3040
of 16,980
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2018, 7:55 pm
In Simien v. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 7:14 am
The case, now titled Information and Privacy Commissioner v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:36 am
In Cicairos v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 2:47 pm
It instead elected to obtain this information in two parts; first, by asking for the numerator (the number of people who got loans), and then (presumably) asking for the more discrete denominator (the number of people who applied for them -- as opposed to the number of people who got letters, which we already know) later. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 4:25 am
It’s largely agreed that the Supreme Court is now well aware that it would have been wiser not to have granted cert in Gonzalez v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 1:10 pm
On Monday, the court granted nine petitions from the enormous number that built up over the summer. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 10:22 am
In People v Steele, the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s suppression of evidence based on the police officer’s investigatory stop of defendant’s vehicle. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm
The People)TABLE OF CASES (Alphabetical by case name)Andersen v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 9:20 pm
People v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 9:03 am
State v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
Granted, some of the uncertainty in the opinion is drawn from its references to passages in Circuit City. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 6:42 pm
The Defendant is not one of those people. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:28 am
Many people never realize when their rights are violated, for example, and many people do not have the knowledge or skills to begin to pursue a case to protect their rights. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
, Haney v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 3:30 am
Life After Hate, Inc. a/k/a Exit USA v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 5:34 am
Our Legislature has granted certain people and corporations privileged status in the law. [read post]
CA1: the First says that 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) is constitutional, because it isn't a rule of decision
8 Feb 2008, 12:42 pm
Evans v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 1:58 pm
And here's a link to my post when oral argument was granted, such as it is.PD-1780-08, Pamela Shareka Langham v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 1:35 am
(Whether or not you agree with the details of this political assessment, assume for the moment that this is how the majority saw it.)Granting standing in this case allows more people (and states) to sue the government, which increases the chances that the EPA will begin to act in a less arbitrary fashion. [read post]
