Search for: "People v. New" Results 3021 - 3040 of 41,457
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2009, 2:27 pm
Here's part of the opinion in a 1986 criminal trespass case in New York, People v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 4:45 am by EEM
V, no. 3 (July-Sept. 2015) [full-text via ReliefWeb]- The five articles in this issue focus "on the migration challenges facing the countries of the Middle East and North Africa (MENA). [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 4:05 pm by Brian Shiffrin
The majority held that despite the language in the New York Court of Appeals decision,People v Benevento (91 N.Y.2d 708, 714 [1998]), that “whether defendant would have been acquitted of the charges but for counsel’s errors isrelevant, but not dispositive" under the Baldi standard such a finding is, in fact dispositive under People v Baldi (54 NY2d 137 [1981]), since "it is hard to envision a scenario where an error that meets the… [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 11:02 am by Glenn Reynolds
It is even clearer that the government may not make decisions about how people will be allowed to use their own property based on the speaker’s past speech.” These people don’t care about the Constitution. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 7:36 am by Jeff Wurzburg (US)
“In light of the district court’s decision in Stewart v. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 1:18 pm
Political Animal (CBS News): McCain and Abortion, by Kevin Drum: McCAIN AND ABORTION....John McCain's reputation for cross-party moderation has been so ingrained for so long that a lot of people simply assume he holds positions he doesn't. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:46 pm by Mark Walsh
” “In reaching that conclusion, we break no new legal ground,” he says. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 10:45 am by JAntonelli
Porn movie company Strike 3 Holdings LLC is suing many people in Connecticut and New York for allegedly downloading its movies using file-sharing technology called BitTorrent. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 6:09 am
. ****** Too Err is Homicide The New York Court of Appeals recently granted leave to appeal in the matter of People v. [read post]