Search for: "Peoples v. Peoples" Results 3021 - 3040 of 72,905
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2020, 12:18 pm by Marty Lederman
  There's simply no reason at all to think that the 2017 Congress believed that anyone (no reasonable person, anyway) would purchase unwanted insurance because of a "sense of legal obligation" engendered by the 2017 statutory amendment.But even if there were some such unreasonable people out there (such as, perhaps, the individual plaintiffs in the case) who mistakenly read the amended Section 5000A to require them to purchase insurance, those… [read post]
12 May 2022, 4:48 am
Those who click on that headline will probably mostly be people who are hot for battle and hating their adversary and — because it's Reich and The Guardian and because of the incipient overruling of Roe v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 2:45 pm
You don't see many people get sanctioned for filing frivolous anti-SLAPP motion in the trial court. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 1:00 pm
We're better at catching people who use methamphetamine than we are are catching terrorists. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 9:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
It also focuses on how the groundbreaking, but widely misunderstood, 2003 decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:03 pm
The Electronic Frontier Foundation has issued an excellent, detailed report about the RIAA's 5 year old litigation campaign:RIAA v. [read post]