Search for: "ROBERT GOODE" Results 3021 - 3040 of 18,369
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2020, 2:32 pm by Josh Blackman
Chief Justice Roberts talks a good game about stare decisis and stability. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:33 am by Nate Holdren
(It feels arrogant of me to say this, but I think it’s a good book. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 8:57 am by Chris Castle
 And even if the majors and a handful of independents get the Content ID tool, YouTube still has the incentive to make Content ID just good enough that they can say it works, but not so good as to actually stop the infringement before it starts. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Justice Kavanaugh posed this precise question during oral argument: JUSTICE KAVANAUGH:  Good morning, counsel. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 10:55 am by Ilya Somin
"Roberts has a good response to that point: The Montana Legislature created the scholarship program; the Legislature never chose to end it, for policy or other reasons. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 11:07 am by Adam Levitin
That's a good thing for those who want to see a more active CFPB right now. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 7:11 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Hodges entered a separate fee-sharing agreement with another solo practitioner, Robert L. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 8:14 pm by Steve Gottlieb
[ii] Stephen Gottlieb, Unfit for Democracy: The Roberts Court and the Breakdown of American Politics 189-208 (2016). [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 12:15 pm
” 4) A tale of two Roberts: two finance ministers, one English, one during the Articles of Confederation era, both scandalous. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 12:15 pm by Christine Corcos
” 4) A tale of two Roberts: two finance ministers, one English, one during the Articles of Confederation era, both scandalous. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 12:13 pm by Matthew Kahn
While McGehee admonished courts to “satisfy themselves from the record, in camera or otherwise, that the [government] in fact had good reason to classify … the materials at issue” and should not presume regularity without verifying the justification, it then retreated, saying judges “cannot second-guess CIA judgments on matters in which the judiciary lacks the requisite expertise. [read post]