Search for: "STATE v. STEVENS" Results 3021 - 3040 of 7,827
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2008, 5:37 am
Supreme Court decision in Medellin v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 1:09 pm
There is no indication that Stevens is willing to join in any sustained effort to undercut the Court's past limitations on sentencing discretion, at the federal or state level -- limitations that Breyer has been challenging repeatedly in dissents. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 5:51 pm by assoulineberlowe
Relying on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision in Stevens v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Patchak v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 10:27 am by David Markus
United States, between Justice Scalia and Steven Lechner, who was making his first appearance before the Nine. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 6:33 am
Peter Marcus Kristensen, International Relations at the End: A Sociological Autopsy Joshua Tschantret, Cleansing the Caliphate: Insurgent Violence against Sexual Minorities Ore Koren & Anoop K Sarbahi, State Capacity, Insurgency, and Civil War: A Disaggregated Analysis Christopher McIntosh & Ian Storey, Between Acquisition and Use: Assessing the Likelihood of Nuclear Terrorism Charles Crabtree, Holger L Kern, & Steven Pfaff, Mass Media and the Diffusion of… [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 10:27 am by Howard Friedman
Rickless, Maimon Schwarzschild, William Voegeli, Larry Alexander, 54 San Diego Law Review 197-341 (2017).Gerard V. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 7:50 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: WENDY WILLIS, f/k/a WENDY DAVIS v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 3:30 am by David Oscar Markus
Supreme Court in a pending case, U.S. v Davila, which addresses the limits on judicial involvement in plea discussions. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 9:30 am
United States District Judge Emmet G. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:55 am by Rory Little
United States, Justice Scalia, joined by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and then-Justice John Paul Stevens, suggested that the clause might be unconstitutionally vague. [read post]