Search for: "Search/Seizure Warrant"
Results 3021 - 3040
of 5,473
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2012, 7:27 pm
Privacy is a right that we have established based on the wording in the 4th Amendment: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 11:00 am
Jones, holding that attaching a GPS device to a car is covered by the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures, we don’t know for certain. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 8:40 am
•If the online law office data is requested by law enforcement agencies, such as by a search warrant or production order, how does the regulator protect the clients’ privileges when the scope of the seizure is indeterminate? [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 2:27 am
However, as we pointed out in our January 2012 coverage, the justices disagreed amongst themselves about why it violated the Fourth Amendment, which protects citizens against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 11:41 pm
Then the search warrants were ruled invalid because they were too broad, making the search and seizure illegal. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:23 pm
Section 180-a, unlike § 813-a, deals with the substantive validity of certain types of seizures and searches without warrants. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 1:00 pm
However, as we pointed out in our January 2012 coverage, the justices disagreed amongst themselves about why it violated the Fourth Amendment, which protects citizens against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 12:28 pm
To make sure the FBI is getting its money's worth, it also tracks the "statistical accomplishments" of snitches - such things as the number of indictments, convictions and search warrants for which they get credit. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 12:28 pm
To make sure the FBI is getting its money's worth, it also tracks the "statistical accomplishments" of snitches - such things as the number of indictments, convictions and search warrants for which they get credit. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 8:09 am
Interpreting the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against “unreasonable searches and seizures,” the Supreme Court has developed a two-part inquiry to determine the constitutionality of surveillance practices. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 7:05 am
Since the officers did not have a search warrant, the search would only be lawful if it was conducted pursuant to one of the exceptions to the 4th Amendment’s warrant requirement. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:01 am
In the reasoning for this decision, the Court repeated the reasons which had already been given in the search warrant. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 6:09 am
Exclusion of government actors from intrusion into one's real property, body, or use of one's personal property, for search, seizure, or for any other reason, without consent, a declared state of war or emergency threat to public, safety, a warrant supported by an affidavit of probable cause, and just compensation for any losses incurred, for each incident.d. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 8:47 am
Perhaps the most fundamental of issues are those that arise under the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath of affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be… [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 4:44 pm
Due to the twists and turns in the Megaupload case that include the New Zealand police illegally executing searches and seizures with invalid warrants, the legal process has become convoluted and is expected to take a long time to resolve. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 3:49 pm
Namely, when the police have a warrant to search a house, the detention of individuals found leaving that house is constitutionally reasonable because of “the nature of the articulable and individualized suspicion on which the police base the detention of the occupant of a home subject to a search warrant. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 9:30 am
In June another judge ruled that the search warrants used to raid Mr Dotcom’s home had been invalid because they had failed to “adequately describe” the offences being investigated. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 9:18 am
The Fourth Amendment states: “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 5:25 am
Stay tuned for that.Here is a summary of some of the more significant decisions issued by SCOTUS this term:Churches are entitled to a "ministerial exception" to their adherence to state and federal employment laws, enabling them to hire whomever they want to stand at the pulpit; the remaining question in this case is how deep into the employee roster this ministerial exception goes.Police must secure a warrant, as required under the 4th Amendment's "search… [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 1:41 pm
The Court ruled on the issue of whether or not the attachment and subsequent use of a GPS tracking device constituted a search or seizure under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
