Search for: "Shields, in Re"
Results 3021 - 3040
of 4,400
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2014, 4:28 pm
We're supposed to rely on the discretion of cops and prosecutors. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 6:09 pm
This is because every state’s right of publicity law incorporates some sort of defense to protect First Amendment interests,[8] and “recogniz[es] that the right of publicity cannot shield public figures from criticism. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 7:58 am
And if you’re wondering “how do I become a freelance digital nomad,” there’s no shortage of tips online. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 2:42 pm
YouTube has an important legal shield that was not available to the old Napster: the so-called "online service provider safe harbors" created by Congress as part of the DMCA. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 9:15 pm
The difference between proprietary estoppel and promissory estoppel is that proprietary estoppel can be used as a sword and shield. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 5:04 am
So all we're really talking about is the alleged theft of a single phone, a phone that was returned a few days after it was "stolen. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 5:44 pm
These agreements are shields for the employers and impact their employees while working and post-employment. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 6:00 am
They're only going to cover your skin. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:19 pm
Cas. 2d (MB) 52 In re: JOHN M. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 10:55 am
Net effect is to produce something very different from US law for people elsewhere—all of the hammers for content owners and none of the shields for users. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 12:01 am
The Supreme Court has repeatedly re-affirmed this principle, stating that U.S. laws should be interpreted “to avoid unreasonable interference with the sovereign authority of other nations. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
Carmen Muro, No. 09-0340 (DDB, and In re State, No. 10-0235 (DDB). [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 6:18 am
” Pre-1992 legislation was shielded from constitutionality review pursuant to Basic Law: Human Dignity and Liberty (by contrast, Basic Law: Freedom of Occupation contained only a limited temporal shield). [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am
The argument that Congress in 1872 had prospectively shielded Cawthorn from a Section 3 challenge lodged 150 years later—a tortured, ahistorical, purportedly textualist argument—had been advanced by Cawthorn’s lawyer, veteran Republican elections attorney James Bopp, Jr. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
., 712 F.3d 60 (1st Cir. 2013) – all of which also travel under the heading, In re Neurontin Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 7:00 am
Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) and James Comer (R-Ky.), Chairman of the House Oversight and Accountability Committee, recently announced their intent to arrange for a congressional delegation to visit January 6th inmates held in the Washington, D.C. jail. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 8:13 am
Below is our quarterly newsletter. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 2:00 pm
The two primary reasons for re-caps are: 1. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 2:00 pm
The two primary reasons for re-caps are: 1. [read post]
17 May 2021, 7:23 am
CAH: First sale is essential to an owner's rights, because it says the owner of a copy of a work, that's lawfully acquired, can do what it wants with the copy, such as re-selling it or disposing of it, short of doing things like copying or other 106 acts. [read post]