Search for: "Smith v. People" Results 3021 - 3040 of 3,931
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
As for the application for a declaration, this had already been made in Smith v Scott and therefore there was nothing of additional practical use which granting a declaration would serve. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 9:38 am by Jeff Gamso
  He's crazy as a bedbug, and clearly was at the time of the killings and the time of the trial.None of those things mattered because the legal standards as they've developed (in part at the Supreme Court in Smith v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 9:59 am
Meanwhile, the IPKat's friend, dynamic small London-based practitioner Shireen Smith (Azrights) is offering an employment opportunity. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 7:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Relatedly, compare the treatment of imitative trade dress to “compare to Brand X” messages—courts are not suspicious of the latter on trademark grounds and haven’t been since Smith v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:30 am by INFORRM
There were hearings in the cases of Hunt v Evening Standard (3 February) and Lord Ashcroft v Independent (3-4 February). [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:17 pm by Katie Smith, ACLU
After 2008's 8th Circuit Court decision in Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 12:19 pm by admin
Smith   Zebras are not domesticable:   Try to saddle me, will you? [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 11:10 am
  The Supreme Court decided a case in 1990, Illinois v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
Judgment of the Court of Appeal The judgment of the Court of Appeal was delivered by Lord Neuberger MR (with whom Maurice Kay and Smith LJJ agreed). [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:01 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal today handed down judgment in the case of JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
This month sees her in Los Angeles County Superior Court where she is being sued by Dawn Simonrangkir for defamation, false light invasion of privacy, intentional infliction of emotional distress, breach of contract and tortious interference with economic advantage (Dawn Simonrangkir a/k/a Dawn Younger-Smith a/k/a Boudoir Queen v Courtney Michelle Love and Does 1-25 inclusive, Case No. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:40 pm by Jon McLaughlin
Only in 1983 did the General Assembly amend Section 401(a) to add the 90-days-before-filing alternative (see Section 401(a), Supplement to Historical and Practice Notes, Ill.Ann.Stat. ch. 40, ¶ 401 (Smith-Hurd 1985 pocket part)). [read post]