Search for: "State v. B. V."
Results 3021 - 3040
of 41,788
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2010, 10:20 am
The Magistrate Judge recognized Local Rule 3.04(b), and stated adequate reasons for her decision as to the location. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 9:17 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 10:58 am
§99.101(b)(v), because it only involved “one case. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 3:41 pm
" The Court distinguished this case from Webster v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 5:14 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Smith v Northamptonshire County Council [2008] EWCA Civ 181 (11 March 2008) XZ (Russia) & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 180 (11 March 2008) Smith v Northamptonshire County Council [2008] EWCA Civ 181 (11 March 2008) McKenny & Anor v Foster (t/a Foster Partnership) [2008] EWCA Civ 173 (06 March 2008) High Court (Family Division) PD v MD [2008] EWHC 403 (Fam) (03… [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 12:15 pm
§ 271(b). [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:30 am
Lastly, Lord Justice Clark dismissed Popplewell J’s third reason above by stating “I do not regard the validity of my interpretation to be impugned because there is an element of tautology” and “I do not regard his erratic use of the comma as any real guide to meaning. [read post]
14 May 2008, 7:51 am
In Gonzalez v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 5:13 pm
The Court’s reasoning Silber J considered the case of R (Animal Defenders International) v Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport [2008] UKHL 15 and concluded that even though that case is awaiting a ruling from the Grand Chamber in Strasbourg, he was bound by the House of Lords’ ruling that the prohibitions on political advertising contained in sections 319 and 321 of the 2003 Act were justified as being necessary in a democratic society and… [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 4:29 am
That was the issue before the Connecticut Appellate Court in Demarco v. [read post]
20 Oct 2012, 7:20 am
For more background on the Apple v. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 10:53 pm
State v. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 10:18 pm
Per U.S. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 11:10 am
Attorney Preet Bharara has filed a 53-page complaint in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, United States of America v Carl Kruger, Richard Lipsky, Aaron Malinski, Solomon Kalish, Robert Aquino, David Rosen, William Boyland, Jr. and Michael Turano, alleging violations of 18 USC §§1341, 1343, 1346, 1349, and 1956(a)(1)(B) and (h).In a press release issued March 10, 2011, concerning the complaint, Governor Cuomo… [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 4:15 am
§ 1400(b). [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:53 am
The appeal in the matter of Mastercard Incorporated and others v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE has been adjusted in listing this week and will now commence from 10am tomorrow, Wednesday 13 May 2020. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 4:30 am
Does Article 22(1)(b) operate to prevent a claimant’s entitlement to the care component of DLA being defeated by a residence requirement imposed by national legislation on a transfer of residence to another member state? [read post]
