Search for: "State v. B. V." Results 3021 - 3040 of 41,752
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2023, 7:00 am by Eden Winlow (Bristows)
To take an example, what if a piece of novelty-only art disclosed all the claimed features of a patent claim except for a claim feature that the product be painted blue (an aesthetic choice clearly excluded by s.2(b) Patents Act, Art 52(2)(b) EPC)? [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 5:00 am by Unknown
According to the SEC, the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction because the law firm has not identified a case or controversy and it does not have standing or a ripe dispute (Hodl Law, PLLC v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 12:20 pm by Michael Froomkin
The article’s claims that (a) disempowering the Senate and (b) abolishing the Senate would not violate the Entrenchment Clause are claims that have been made before, although rarely. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 2:13 pm by Alejandro Moreno and Eugene Choi
Under Caremark, a plaintiff may state a claim for failure of oversight against a director where such director acted in bad faith by (1) utterly failing to implement any reporting or information systems or controls; or (2) having implemented such a system or controls, consciously failing to monitor or oversee their operations, including ignoring red flags. [read post]
The division bench comprising of Justices M R Shah and B V Nagarathna asked the state to make necessary amendments to the Explanation to Section 10 (26AAA) of the act. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
Identifying the applicable standard, the court stated: “To plead a Red-Flags Claim that will survive a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, a plaintiff must plead facts supporting an inference that the fiduciary knew of evidence of corporate misconduct. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
Identifying the applicable standard, the court stated: “To plead a Red-Flags Claim that will survive a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, a plaintiff must plead facts supporting an inference that the fiduciary knew of evidence of corporate misconduct. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
The court stated that it did not need to decide whether liability existed under the prong 1 claim to dispose of the motion to dismiss, but noted that a report prepared by external counsel indicated that the company had a “woefully inadequate compliance system. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by Ryan Goodman
Trump and other defendants as soon as reasonably possible[2-b]. [2-a] This is consistent with and reflected in the book. [2-b] This is not consistent with or reflected in the book. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 1:37 pm by Guest Author
The SEC’s Office of Economic Analysis’ 2009 Study on Section 404 states this point more explicitly: “Section 13(b)(2) of the Exchange Act requires companies to maintain effective ICFR, while Section 404 requires management to report on the effectiveness of ICFR. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 8:30 am by Marcel Pemsel
Alternatively, the sign can also be submitted in a single digital file (Rules 9(4)(a)(v), 15(1)(iii), 17(2)(v) and 32(1)(b) of the Regulations and Section 11bis of the Administrative Instructions). [read post]