Search for: "State v. Doctor"
Results 3021 - 3040
of 9,595
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2010, 3:53 am
First this: On Tuesday, in State v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 4:00 am
Mabus, No. 08-1238ADEASee issue description at Public CitizenSCOTUS docket hereUnited States Court of Appeals, 2nd CircuitHalpert v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 7:34 pm
In Estelle v Smith (451 US 454 [1981]) the United States Supreme Court considered when the questioning by a person who is not a law enforcement officer is subject to the requirements of Miranda. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 11:03 am
Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 12:27 pm
Amir Sitafalwalla v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 1:44 pm
--Court: United States District Court for the Middle District of FloridaOpinion Date: 5/13/10Cite: Concrete Surface Innovations, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 8:12 am
V.P. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 11:30 pm
Earlier this week, I gave my two-cents on Humphires v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 7:29 am
Stated differently, people need their cars now -- to get to work, to get food, to get their kids to daycare, to get to the doctor. [read post]
22 May 2008, 4:50 am
Michael C. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 8:36 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 4:30 am
Russo, a challenge to a Louisiana law regulating abortion, observing that “[b]ecause the potential consequences of Louisiana’s initiative are so severe, the case is really a test of whether a state can effectively legislate abortion out of existence without criminalizing patients or doctors for seeking or providing it per se, or by attacking Roe v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:15 am
Guttenberg v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 9:30 pm
It’s U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 5:00 am
In the case of Russell v. [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 11:37 am
The case is Cooper v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 10:55 am
In Maryland, and in most states, the medical malpractice doctrine of “informed consent” requires that doctors (in a non-emergency setting) present the patient with important information about the nature of their ailment, the nature of the proposed treatment, the probability of success of contemplated therapy and its alternatives, and the risk of unfortunate consequences associated with such treatment. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 7:23 am
The plaintiffs are doctors who sued over the website's commentary on a disciplinary proceeding that the State of Illinois had instituted against them. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 11:39 am
The Maryland Court of Special Appeals recently rendered a decision in a case, Powell v. [read post]
