Search for: "State v. Field"
Results 3021 - 3040
of 11,760
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2009, 8:05 am
Mona Electric v. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 10:06 am
Facts: This case (Collins v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 6:45 am
The case is Jones v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 1:57 pm
March 7, 2022 – Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC, a veteran owned law firm, gave the winning argument in Mycroft AI v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 8:21 am
Facts: This case (Patenaude v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 7:15 am
Facts: This case (Williams v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 12:56 pm
Tuesday's argument in Sinochem v. [read post]
2 Apr 2016, 12:20 pm
The touchstone became economic evidence (see Lucent v Gateway, ResQnet v Lansa, Uniloc v Microsoft). [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:21 am
But they had included a note with their bid documents essentially stating that their pricing was based on a certain amount of backfill type fill but if more stone fill was in fact required then their unit price was to be adjusted. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 4:57 pm
This is its newsletter dealing with recent developments in the field. [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 2:47 am
BrazilSilveira v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 4:53 pm
(Kiobel v. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 11:50 am
Recent developments have upended many of our earlier predictions of the likely post-election immigration landscape in the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 2:28 pm
Locke v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 4:20 pm
Trump v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:29 am
United StatesLindke v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:25 am
Conklin, who represented plaintiff in an underlying action alleging accounting malpractice, among other things, were entitled to dismissal of the complaint given that plaintiff failed to allege that defendants were negligent or that they proximately caused any damages (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007]; Fielding v Kupferman, 65 AD3d 437, 442 [1st Dept 2009]). [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 3:52 am
Selistö v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 8:34 am
Recently, in the case of State v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 9:49 am
For similar reasons, ASUS’s field preemption argument against the state law claims failed. [read post]
