Search for: "State v. Good Bear"
Results 3021 - 3040
of 5,194
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2014, 4:30 am
Evidence Act) were legislated into hurried existence in the late 1960’s, in response to the decision in, Myers v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:17 am
(Eugene Volokh) From Standard Chartered Bank v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 7:17 am
Such a reference would have been a very good idea from every point of view. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 4:53 am
Pullman v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:31 pm
In form 1001E it kept the pre-checked box at 6-1 that states that all European Patent Convention (EPC) contract states are designated. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Md. 2012) (same); New York State Pesticide Coalition, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 2:34 pm
Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, where "the [state] action bears so heavily on an individual's choice as to have virtually the preclusive effect of a direct prohibition." [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 8:15 am
Therein lies the rub of United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 11:24 am
After United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:43 am
They’re also obviously at risk of simply describing, in a laudatory manner, characteristics of the goods or services in question.CJEU Cases C-398/08 P Audi AG v OHIM (VORSPRUNG DURCH TECHNIK) and C-311/11 P Smart Technologies ULC v OHIM (WIR MACHEN DAS BESONDERE EINFACH), already blogged by Jeremy hereand here, set out the position in Europe. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:59 pm
Holland, Looking Good at 93? [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 12:57 pm
The prison warden broke the strike by making their lives too miserable to bear. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 5:55 am
“Many distinguished leaders in government, academia, science and business are Yale alumni, including three of the past four United States presidents. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 4:33 am
According to the recent Generics v Teva/Yeda decision, the burden of proof should therefore be on the alleged infringer, not the patentee. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:40 pm
Kimbell Foods, which requires courts crafting federal common law to incorporate state standards unless there is a good reason to create nationally uniform standards. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 10:41 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 8:44 am
The district court’s order granting summary judgment in Carnes v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
In State v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 4:29 am
that the first sale doctrine, which allows for legally acquired copyright-protected works (or, in trademark, goods bearing a trademark) to be resold by their owners, applies to works made overseas — notwithstanding language in the Copyright Act that many courts had held suggested otherwise. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:12 am
That’s a good thing, too. [read post]
