Search for: "State v. House" Results 3021 - 3040 of 28,802
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2022, 8:17 am by Jeff R. Vaisa
The Sixth Circuit’s Business Development Corporation of South Carolina v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 6:57 am by Eric Goldman
Also because of the combination, FOSTA enabled a Section 230 exclusion for civil claims for state commercial sex promotions but not for state sex trafficking claims. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 4:52 am by Emma Snell
The Marquette Law School poll, which was conducted just days after the court overturned Roe v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 2:25 pm by Paul Rosenthal
Last week, six House Democrats introduced H.R. 8334, the Robotext Scam Prevention Act, which seeks to expand federal telemarketing laws to, among other things, expressly cover text messaging. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 11:31 am by Benjamin Pollard
(b)  The HRG, in support of the Deputies Committee of the National Security Council and consistent with the process outlined in National Security Memorandum 2 of February 4, 2021 (Renewing the National Security Council System), or any successor memorandum, shall: (i)    identify and recommend options and strategies to the President through the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs to secure the recovery of hostages or the return of wrongfully detained United… [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by Richard J. Pierce, Jr.
An example of this phenomenon lies in a six-justice majority decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 6:00 am by jonathanturley
Here is the column: Throughout its history, the Supreme Court has overturned long-standing precedents, as it did recently in Dobbs v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:22 am by INFORRM
The House of Commons vote on the Online Safety Bill has been delayed until the autumn following the resignation of Boris Johnson as Prime Minister. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 2:42 pm by Giles Peaker
As per Williams v Parmar, an award of 100% should be reserved for the most serious cases (at least when section 46 Housing and Planning Act 2016 did not apply). [read post]