Search for: "State v. Main"
Results 3021 - 3040
of 11,546
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2019, 11:57 am
The main, obvious and inescapable criticism is that it takes far too long for tariffs to be decided and they are thus usually very retroactive. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:14 am
For example, in Golden State Transit Corp. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
In Geduldig v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:41 pm
Richard V. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
In United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
” In a welcome development, the CA backed the approach of Laddie J (“a judge with prolific expertise in the law of copyright”) in Cala Homes v Alfred McAlpine [1995] FSR 818 at p.835 over the narrower one of Lightman J in Robin Ray v Classic FM [1998] FSR 622 at [27]-[28]. [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
The main difference is that fraud under the Securities Act applies to the “offer or sale” of securities instead of the “purchase and sale” of securities. [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 8:09 am
Supreme Court case, Batson v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
They included the House Un-American Activities Committee and other McCarthyite organizations (including some within the Executive Branch); as well as the white men on the Alabama jury in New York Times v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 3:31 am
While free speech isn’t shed at the school yard gates, as the Supreme Court held in Tinker v. [read post]
Patent Eligible Subject Matter Reform in the United States: The Pendulum Will Swing Too Far (again)?
16 Oct 2019, 3:45 pm
In the United States, the law of patent eligible subject matter has become a big mess. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 7:52 am
Eyewitness testimony from officers, including FST performance, is often the main evidence presented by the state. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 6:21 am
What the Bill Does The bill has two main parts. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 3:56 pm
Important though the UK Supreme Court’s decision is, its main points can be summarized briefly. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 3:15 pm
See, of course, CCH Canadian Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 5:00 am
” Gompers v United States, 233 U.S. 604, 610 (1914). [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 12:54 pm
Federica Persano (University of Bergamo) followed and pointed out the insufficiencies of the GDPR in what regards children that are the most vulnerable group but also the main actor in the digital era. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 10:47 am
On appeal in Simon v. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 1:01 am
The brief was instrumental in getting the Supreme Court to declare that state maximum-hours laws were constitutional, and the technique used – the gathering and presentation of socially relevant facts—became the main instrument for shaping American law according to social need rather than judicial precedent. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 9:56 am
” The recent judgment of 12 September 2019 (case C-688/12, Bayer Pharma AG v. [read post]
