Search for: "State v. Means"
Results 3021 - 3040
of 61,250
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
Numerous studies show that Chevron deference is currently the exception rather than the rule, and since 2001’s United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 7:10 pm
In State v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 7:10 pm
In State v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 8:24 am
The case, U.S. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 9:18 am
Interestingly, that means he could try to preserve Quill, or join a narrow ruling upholding South Dakota but not what other states are doing. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 11:25 pm
New York’s Administrative Procedures Act does not require a State agency to issue a declaratory ruling when requestedMatter of Humane Society of United States, Inc. v Brennan, 63 AD3d 1419The genesis of this lawsuit was the New York State’s Department of Agriculture and Markets' declining to issue a declaration that foie gras* is an adulterated food product within the meaning of Agriculture and Markets Law §200. [read post]
12 Jan 2025, 7:32 am
’ ” Chafin v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 6:41 am
” (Cite to Dart v. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 8:36 pm
This means that if either died, the other could not act under it. [read post]
8 May 2019, 9:58 am
State v. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 8:14 am
Medicaid is means tested. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 5:33 am
On appeal, Dent argued that the state failed to prove that she obtained `property’ within the meaning of the statute when all the state proved was the inability of other deputies to sign up for the opportunity to obtain overtime. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:41 am
United States. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:39 am
United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 5:41 pm
The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania’s decision in Yoder v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:02 am
The 2008 Superior Court of Quebec decision in Teitelbaum v. 9093-8119 Quebec Inc. and the 1980 Ontario Supreme Court decision in Royal Bank of Canada v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 4:52 am
Merit Decision On December 6, 2012, the Supreme Court handed down a merit decision in Doss v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 9:12 am
On Tuesday, the Court handed down its decision in CSX Transporation v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:26 am
In Sullivan v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 8:04 am
must be interpreted as meaning that the holder of an intellectual property right over goods sold to a person residing in the territory of a Member State through an online sales website in a non-member country enjoys the protection afforded to that holder by that regulation at the time when those goods enter the territory of that Member State merely by virtue of the acquisition of those goods. [read post]
