Search for: "State v. Peoples" Results 3021 - 3040 of 45,013
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2011, 6:10 pm by IP Dragon
However, "[b]ecause Defendant PRC's wrongful acts alleged herein arise in connection with a commercial activity that causes a direct effect in the United Stated, Defendant PRC comes within an express exception to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, viz, 28 U.S.C. section 1605 (a)(2):(a) A foreign state shall not be immune from the jurisdiction of courts of the United States or of the States in any case - (1) in which the foreign state has… [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 6:41 am
Roe v Wade established the abortion right as against state criminal prohibitions (1973), followed by Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 6:41 am by Christine Corcos
Roe v Wade established the abortion right as against state criminal prohibitions (1973), followed by Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Article V tells us that we can amend the Constitution by calling a national convention to propose changes, and then ratifying those proposals in state conventions. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:09 am by Brian Shiffrin
Correia,First Assistant Wayne County Public DefenderThe Court of Appeals recently issued a decision on two consolidated cases (People v Brannon and People v Fernandez (2011 NY Slip Op 03676, _ NY3d _ [5/11/11) which set forth the level of knowledge a police officer must possess before, consistent with DeBour, he or she has reasonable suspicion to believe an individual possesses a gravity knife as opposed to a legal pocketknife.In People v… [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 5:01 am
State, then those allegations can be admissible. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 7:05 pm by Michael Ginsborg
Patrick Bauer, D-South Bend, said the amendment is unlikely to receive a hearing this year, arguing the state's trial and appeals courts have upheld Indiana's marriage law [Morrison v. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 6:03 am
Yesterday in People v Hurley, 2008 NY Slip Op 00343, the First Department held that no appeal lies from the denial of a criminal defendant's motion for a subpoena duces tecum. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 12:50 pm
On a night when CAAF released its blockbuster opinion in Lopez de Victoria, we can't expect many people to want to go see the small indie release of United States v. [read post]