Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 3021 - 3040
of 4,765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2012, 4:23 pm
"It is time for Congress to pass the Arbitration Fairness Act to protect consumers and employees from these abusive practices. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 5:15 am
” Google v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 9:07 pm
That case, Turtle Islands Foods V. [read post]
5 May 2020, 7:57 am
This test allows consumers to decide which terms merit trademark protection. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 8:15 am
Gonzaga High – it’s akin to rushing river v. water fountain. [read post]
21 May 2010, 12:05 pm
The entire exercise is an effort to gin up, in the apt words of Kelly Cobb at Americans for Tax Reform, a “phony wireless crisis” to serve as a basis for a sweeping regulatory agenda for broadband and the Internet that, to succeed in the wake of Comcast v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 6:35 am
” She writes: I was brought up to believe that following the law isn’t optional. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
Molina v. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 7:07 am
The consumer protection at the base of TM policy is source quality, not moral quality. [read post]
23 May 2018, 6:46 am
Horton, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 5:06 am
This is actually a long-running joke among Copyright Office staff, but most of us don’t have windows. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 12:39 pm
Instead, again, they cite to Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
While FDA has added a Center for Tobacco Products and there are still lots of cases against tobacco manufacturers, we are more likely to talk about some consumer protection or preemption issue from a food case than any issue from a tobacco case. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 12:58 am
The case is Ray v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 2:03 pm
In Diop v. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 7:10 am
Broadcom Corp. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 10:46 am
The plaintiffs proposed three separate multi-state classes, one for each of their claims of unjust enrichment, state consumer protection laws, and breaches of the implied warranty of merchantability. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 8:28 am
This at least is the conclusion one can draw from Case T-28/08, Mars v OHIM, in which the Court of First Instance of the European Communities confirmed that its Community trade mark for the three-dimensional shape of its Bounty bar was invalidly registered (see commentary on this decision here). [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 7:56 pm
CCA and B, LLC v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 10:01 am
That year, the Court handed down Hamdan v. [read post]
