Search for: "United States v. Cooper"
Results 3021 - 3040
of 4,613
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2014, 5:07 am
State v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 8:53 am
“The United States has an obligation to ensure asylum seekers have access to a safe haven from persecution,” said Katrina Eiland of the ACLU. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 8:53 am
“The United States has an obligation to ensure asylum seekers have access to a safe haven from persecution,” said Katrina Eiland of the ACLU. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:38 am
While Huawei v. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 11:49 am
The constitutional implications of mass quantities of data were at the heart of five Justices’ concurrences in United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
(United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2019, 7:53 am
Decisions this Week United StatesSpeech First, INC. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:30 pm
For example, the Commissioner cites United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 6:02 pm
J. 857, 870-73 (2009); United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 10:51 am
Additionally, Title V (§ 5105) would extend protection against national origin and citizenship status discrimination beyond the acts of hiring and discharge from employment to also include “verification of the individual’s eligibility to work in the United States” or “verification of employment authorization,” and would transfer enforcement jurisdiction over this form of national origin discrimination from the Equal Employment Opportunity… [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 10:51 am
Additionally, Title V (§ 5105) would extend protection against national origin and citizenship status discrimination beyond the acts of hiring and discharge from employment to also include “verification of the individual’s eligibility to work in the United States” or “verification of employment authorization,” and would transfer enforcement jurisdiction over this form of national origin discrimination from the Equal Employment Opportunity… [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 7:31 am
There is, after all, still the question of where the commission proceeding would be held given (i) administration reluctance to bring new persons to GTMO, (ii) apparent Iraqi unwillingness to cooperate should the plan be to send Daqduq to GTMO, and (iii) legislative opposition to bringing Daqduq into the United States. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 10:54 am
Her widely cited dissenting opinion in Kelo v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
United States, 740 F.2d 1428, 1440 (8th Cir. 1984); Madsen v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 1:14 am
In the Ninth Circuit appeal of the Epic Games v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
Media reports indicate that this Ordinance was drafted during the previous regime under the United Progressive Alliance. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 8:33 am
_________________________________________________ United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am
Whole Foods[24] and United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 7:13 am
Yet another case: U.S. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 11:10 am
The United States Government does not challenge that position. [read post]
