Search for: "Washington v. Downes"
Results 3021 - 3040
of 5,954
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2015, 11:55 am
The most famous example of the modern era was in 1996, when a blizzard shut down most of official Washington but not the Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 6:41 am
Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 4:06 pm
Perry, in which a district court struck down the Texas bans (see prior posting) (audio recording of full oral arguments); and Campaign for Southern Equality v. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 12:24 pm
(Bill O’Leary/The Washington Post) This is the question the Supreme Court is facing Monday in Reed v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:44 am
Apr. 2, 2012) (applying Utah law).Washington: Braaten v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm
Solutions Ltd., Washington Chief District Judge Marsha J. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 1:17 pm
In the wave of court rulings following the Supreme Court’s July 2013 ruling in United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:14 am
We spent part of our winter vacation on a quick family trip to Washington D.C. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 8:51 am
The Justices turned down the first round of new cases on October 6. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 3:30 am
A notable exception was the Court’s 1954 decision in Brown v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 12:41 pm
For four years.But Mann's girlfriend, who knew about (and saw) the whole thing, eventually got tired of Mann's abuse and took their daughter and moved from Arizona to live with her father in Washington. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 12:21 pm
Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004). [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 12:13 pm
The Second Circuit relied upon a thirty year old Supreme Court opinion, Dirks v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 8:04 am
In Syria, news spread that an Israeli drone had been “downed. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 6:45 am
An interesting wrinkle in the preemption argument, as put forward by the complaining states, is that it expressly relies upon the rationale of Gonzales v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 9:42 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Michigan v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 7:44 am
The case, RILR v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:43 pm
Judge Facciola’s key eDiscovery opinions include: Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Washington v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 12:52 pm
In the case of Department of Transportation v. [read post]
