Search for: "*u.s. v. Chang" Results 3041 - 3060 of 24,074
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2022, 8:00 am by Paul Caron
Law360, GOP Eyes Tax Changes As Roe Hangs In Balance: Republicans could push to implement changes in the tax code that would restrict access to abortion and incentivize childbirth if the U.S. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 11:20 pm by Florian Mueller
It could be that when all is said and done (i.e., all appeals have been exhausted, and this case could easily reach the European Court of Justice), Apple will be allowed to undo its rule change for Dutch dating apps--but it could also be that the full ACM decision will be released and enforced. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm by Randy E. Barnett
City of New London and the Limits of Eminent Domain (2015) 2015: Damon Root, Over Ruled: The Long War for the Control of the U.S. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 12:16 pm by Lindsay Griffiths
Nothing much has changed today, with the next new shiny thing. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 7:32 am by James Romoser
Adler, The Volokh Conspiracy) When Faith and Football Teamed Up Against American Democracy (Greg Bishop, Sports Illustrated) How Overturning Roe Could Change The Way Americans Think About Abortion (Amelia Thomson-DeVeaux, FiveThirtyEight) More on Section 1782: Why the U.S. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  There is a utility, in playing any game, to having rulebooks—and umpires or referees who will enforce them, even as it is also necessary to make sure that the rules of the game can be changed to take account of new circumstances. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 3:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Changes in rates of private investment and private consumption are highly correlated with tax changes. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 11:57 am by Hyland Hunt
EPA, 549 U.S. 497, 527-28 (2007), requiring a “plain error of law or a fundamental change in the factual premises previously considered by the agency. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 9:11 am by Benjamin Pollard
Pompilio posted the Supreme Court’s decision in Egbert v. [read post]