Search for: "ADAMS v. ADAMS" Results 3041 - 3060 of 8,024
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2015, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Portrait of Adams by John Trumbull, 1792–93 A century after Brailsford, however, in Sparf v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 12:57 am by Adam Wagner
In Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights found, unanimously, a violation of article 10 ECHR. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:02 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 The Michigan Court of Appeals ruled in a 2004 published case (People v Adams) that a defendant cannot assert a defense at trial of his or her, "inability to pay" the court-ordered child support.Accordingly, in the Likine case, the Attorney General requested trial judge John McDonald to preclude Likine from introducing any of the above facts regarding her disability and resulting lack of income from jury consideration. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:45 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 The Michigan Court of Appeals ruled in a 2004 published case (People v Adams) that a defendant cannot assert a defense at trial of his or her, "inability to pay" the court-ordered child support.Accordingly, in the Likine case, the Attorney General requested trial judge John McDonald to preclude Likine from introducing any of the above facts regarding her disability and resulting lack of income from jury consideration. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 7:20 am by Erin Miller
The Court heard argument yesterday in Samantar v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:00 am by Matt Sundquist
Emshwiller and Jess Bravin of the WSJ report on the case, as do Lyle Denniston of this blog, and Adam Liptak of the New York Times. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 5:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The Sacco defendants failed to submit evidence establishing, prima facie, the absence of at least one essential element of the legal [*2]malpractice cause of action (see Aqua-Trol Corp. v Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., 197 AD3d at 545; Fricano v Law Offs. of Tisha Adams, LLC, 194 AD3d 1016, 1018; Ferrigno v Jaghab, Jaghab & Jaghab, P.C., 152 AD3d 650, 652; Atiencia v Pinczewski, 148 AD3d 860, 861). [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 3:46 am by SHG
The Supreme Court ruled in the landmark 1975 case O’Connor v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 6:00 am by jonathanturley
” Later, Chief Justice John Marshall also was burned in effigy after writing the famous opinion in Marbury v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:40 am by Melina Padron
R v Peacock: Michael Peacock was charged under the Obscene Publications Act 1959. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 5:21 pm
"Sleeping is unquestionably a significant activity -- human beings spend roughly a third of their lives doing it," Tatel wrote in Desmond v. [read post]