Search for: "American Express Co."
Results 3041 - 3060
of 4,916
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2013, 9:30 am
Murray said the fourth case, American Express Co. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 6:42 am
Medellin is not a unique expression of American values. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Concord EFS, Inc. 13-63Issue: Whether a plaintiff who purchases directly from a member of a price-fixing conspiracy is necessarily a “direct purchaser” under Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 8:34 pm
While covering these events, my blog has been inundated with comments expressing outrage at FDA and state regulators for raw milk cheese “crackdowns. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
The following post is exclusively the work of the Reed Smith side of the blog.Sometimes the smallest, least significant type of lawsuit can illustrate cracks in the edifice of the largest, most consequential litigation. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 6:47 am
Here is the abstract: This article provides commentary on the Supreme Court’s decision relating to classwide waivers in arbitration clauses in American Express Co. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 8:51 am
The Sixth Circuit issued an opinion yesterday in American Express Travel Related Services Co., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 8:51 am
The Sixth Circuit issued an opinion yesterday in American Express Travel Related Services Co., Inc. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 7:56 pm
These peremptory norms, jus cogens, remain quite controversial (e.g., Inter-American Court, The Legal Status and Rights of Undocumented Migrants, Mexico, Advisory Opinion OC-18/03 (Decision No) Inter-Am. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 7:38 am
Instead of talking facts, Commissioner Wright stayed at a theoretical level and just expressed opinion after opinion. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 6:53 pm
This is a notion we encountered first with the Institutes (though its origins lie much farther back in Western ideological history and practice).On the one hand, consent can be understood as the expression of the popular will, made manifest through government and expressed in law enacted through this apparatus of state. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 1:51 pm
Guest Post by Jonas Anderson, Assistant Professor at American University, Washington College of Law. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 1:31 pm
March 27, 2013) and American Express v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 12:02 pm
In that case, the Court decided that the Constitution did not forbid the University of Michigan Law School from granting African Americans, Hispanics and American Indians very large admissions preferences. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 6:04 am
This post is co-authored by Alan M. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 10:13 am
I've covered similar terrain before with my co-author, Ted Chiappari: "Republicans’ Mexican-American Presidential Candidate: Mitt Romney?." [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 9:30 am
Rogers College of Law Cases to be discussed are (click the names to read the opinions): American Express Co. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 9:57 am
It is expressed as a responsibility to protect, and it is – on this argument – both compelled as a legal conclusion arising from the underlying prohibition on mass atrocities and, moreover, something that has gained sufficient acceptance in the community of international law to qualify as, if not necessarily “law,” at least not contrary to international law. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 7:14 am
Quality, Quality, Quality,” I talked of the importance of credibility in the context of what makes for a good Chinese (or any other) litigator and I did so by quoting the following email from co-blogger Steve Dickinson to me: The reason ______ has influence with the court is NOT because he is a powerful person. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
The court responded that the law does nothing to single out expressive activity. [read post]
