Search for: "Attorney General v. Superior Court"
Results 3041 - 3060
of 3,267
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2008, 2:14 am
Safe to say, for Deputy Attorney general Jeremy Friedlander, Harvest v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 11:15 am
See Rhode Island v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 10:59 am
Stanway v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 8:47 am
The Court of Appeal disagreed, affirming in an unpublished opinion.Years later, the state Supreme Court decided People v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 4:03 am
On appeal, the defendant and the attorney general agreed that the matter should be remanded to the trial court so that the judge could exercise his discretion as to whether to grant the motion. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Court reconsidering baseless ‘making available’ theory in file-sharing case Capitol Records v Jammie Thomas; amicus briefs from, MPAA, PFF: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Electronic Fontier Foundation), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Patry Copyright Blog) ICANN approves rules allowing brands… [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 7:14 pm
As the California Court of Appeals stated in 2007 in Rapid v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
Supreme Court, June 18, 2008 Munaf v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 12:04 pm
Superior Court, 12 Cal.3d 447, 453 (Cal. 1974)). [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 8:35 pm
In Guerrero v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 11:50 am
See Bryant, at 19-25Download PDF file of General Motors v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 1:16 pm
Co. - The Marion Superior Court entered a summary judgment in favor of Connecticut General and, Gruber, an insurance agent, ruling that they could not be held liable on the insured's claims of negligence and bad faith. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 12:43 am
Although it sounds a little bit like hearsay (or maybe just protection of confidential sources), Wage Law is reporting that some Superior Court judges, particularly in the Bay Area, believe that a "claims made" class action settlement should never be approved in a wage & hour case. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 11:30 am
In Littman v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 10:57 am
The Attorney General commenced an action against the Appellees in September 2006 in the Harrison Circuit Court. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 11:00 pm
District Court Judge William Alsup in Kakani v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 6:58 pm
So Chambers' attorney then filed a new divorce action in the Superior Court, reasoning that the state trial court of general jurisdiction should have the residual power to dissolve marriages when the Family Court lacked jurisdiction. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 11:08 am
In Canada v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 7:31 am
Pam KarlanRick Hills's recent post over at Prawfsblawg on the Supreme Court's decision in Riley v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 6:19 am
Arguing for the prosecution, deputy state attorney general James B. [read post]
