Search for: "BAKER v BAKER" Results 3041 - 3060 of 4,848
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2015, 10:17 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
KokeshCase Number: 09-cv-01021 (United States District Court for the District of New Mexico)Case Filed: October 27, 2009Qualifying Judgment/Order: March 30, 2015 4/30/15 7/29/15 2015-39 SEC v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 1:37 pm by Mary Jane Wilmoth
KokeshCase Number: 09-cv-01021 (United States District Court for the District of New Mexico)Case Filed: October 27, 2009Qualifying Judgment/Order: March 30, 2015 4/30/15 7/29/15 2015-39 SEC v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 5:56 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps discusses two capital cases on the court’s docket next term: Madison v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 6:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
  Prior to joining the faculty at Missouri, Dr Strong was Counsel specializing in international dispute resolution at Baker & McKenzie LLP and a dual-qualified practitioner (U.S. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 8:51 am by Michelle Yeary
Dec. 19, 2006) (payments to prescriber of "hundreds of thousands of dollars over the years to conduct research and give lectures" did not oust learned intermediary rule; "payment for research is a widespread practice" thus cannot be a "special circumstance" that would set aside the rule).Baker v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
Thanks to a Barcelona Court reference, the CJEU has been called on to enter the debate -- which goes far beyond taxis and concern the much broader relation between traditional and sharing economy, explains Katfriend Revital Cohen (Baker & McKenzie, Barcelona).* Jumpin' through hoops? [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
Lachaux v Independent Print, heard 13 and 14 November 2018 (UKSC) ZXC v Bloomberg, heard 27-28 and 30 November 2018 (Nicklin J) R (on the application of Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal, heard 3 and 4 December 2018 (UKSC) Ali v Channel 5, heard 4 December 2018 (Irwin, Newey and Baker LJJ). [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
And, in Murphy v Callinan [2018] IESC 59 (30 November 2018) [36]-[44], Baker J (Clarke CJ and Dunne J concurring) in the Supreme Court approved Feeney J’s analysis in Collins (I will return to this case in a future post). [read post]