Search for: "BAKER v. STATE"
Results 3041 - 3060
of 3,485
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2008, 5:56 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:06 pm
Baker, No. 06-40757 Conviction for possessing, receiving, and distributing child pornography is affirmed in part and reversed in part, and the sentence vacated and remanded, where: 1) a pretrial motion to suppress evidence was properly denied; but 2) two government exhibits that were the basis for the distribution conviction were improperly admitted as lacking respectively a proper foundation and proper authentication. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
App. 1975) (a "state can never sue in tort in its political or governmental capacity"), aff'd, 356 N.E.2d 561 (Ill. 1976).Chicago v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:38 am
Baker, 128 S. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
Life Investors, Inc. (1986) 178 Cal.App.3d 313, 317 [223 Cal.Rptr. 539], superseded by statute as stated in Cooper v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:49 pm
This was a reference to the Supreme Court decision in 1972 in the case of Baker v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 9:42 pm
But "Ohio State" has echoes of one of the key cases cited in support of the mandate: the 1942 decision in Wickard v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
Shipley, Conflicts Between Copyright and the First Amendment After Harper & Row, Publishers v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 7:36 am
Supreme Court, in Shinn v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 12:17 pm
Yohn Jr. in Teva v. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:52 am
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s ruling in Davidson v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 7:21 am
Tim Edgar examined the Schrems v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 7:08 am
Late last year, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled in R. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:51 am
Under the “one-person-one-vote” rule established in Baker v. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 4:00 pm
Bartlow v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 8:14 am
Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:46 am
In the leading Indian decision on the point, Linklaters v ITO, this solution has been rejected. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
(ret), a leading expert in information age conflict and the law of war, has stated unequivocally that t [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 1:18 pm
” State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 6:21 am
Kirksey is cited in the following article: Charles Calleros & Val Ricks, Kirksey v. [read post]
