Search for: "Banks v. US" Results 3041 - 3060 of 14,497
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2019, 10:00 am by Frank Bowman
A bank president who privately diverts bank money to her personal accounts may have committed bank theft, but she does not commit bank fraud. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:27 am by Margaret Taylor
The first type—an assertion of presidential communications privilege—represents the core of executive privilege that was first recognized in U.S. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:08 pm by Robert Liles
For example, in South Florida, law enforcement has previously found that some Medicare providers and suppliers have taken steps to hide their ownership through the use of straw owners. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:08 pm by admin
For example, in South Florida, law enforcement has previously found that some Medicare providers and suppliers have taken steps to hide their ownership through the use of straw owners. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 10:16 am by Adam Levitin
The class action suits argue that under the 2d Circuit's Madden v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
” We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:37 am by Margaret Taylor
On Sept. 13, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff issued a subpoena to Acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire to compel the production of a whistleblower complaint. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:01 am by Jeffrey Mitchell
 Note the August newsletter (available here) included a link to a recent report by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City on the digital divide. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 9:06 am by Matthew Davie
The issues were: (1) whether ECHR Article 8 was engaged; (2) whether the SWP’s activities were “in accordance with the law”; and (3) whether the SWP’s activities were “necessary in a democratic society” in the interests of one of the objectives stated in Article 8(2), in accordance with the four-part test set out by the UK Supreme Court in Bank Mellat v Her Majesty’s Treasury (No 2) [2014] AC 700. [read post]