Search for: "Branch v. United States"
Results 3041 - 3060
of 4,123
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2025, 9:05 pm
President Reagan tried to honor a campaign pledge by having the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration repeal its rule that required the installation of airbags or automatic seatbelts in all cars sold in the United States. [read post]
22 May 2025, 11:27 pm
In his view, the executive order does not violate the Citizenship Clause as originally understood, and he urged the Court to re-examine the long-standing precedent of United States v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 9:52 am
Congress for its part nearly passed an override to the Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 9:03 am
" Marbury v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 10:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 1:32 pm
United States Dep’t of State, 347 F. [read post]
3 May 2012, 7:13 am
United States, 98 U.S. (8 Otto.) 145 (1878) (same)). [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 9:41 am
The AIA, Its Preclusion Statutes, and Cuozzo’s Path to the Supreme Court The 2011 America Invents Act (AIA) created new patent reviews within the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO): inter partes review (IPR), post-grant review (PGR), and covered business method review (CBM). [read post]
20 May 2021, 10:09 am
(For example, I argued beforehand that the court would be wrong to rule as it did in Shelby County v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
”[14] Sandy did not merely extend an olive branch to his religiously-minded colleagues. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:08 am
Congress enacted the CRA in response to the United States Supreme Court decision, in INS v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 8:20 am
Urbina previously had ordered that the Uighurs must be released, and that the only place for them to be sent was to live, at least temporarily, in the United States. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 1:03 pm
United States, 530 US 428 (2000). [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:08 am
Still, questions remain.In Samantar v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 10:30 am
The case known as Al Haramain v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 7:38 am
Federal restrictions require that promotional or advertising materials not include any content that could be interpreted to imply affiliation with, or endorsement by, any agency, branch, office or other instrumentality of the United States. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 5:01 am
Besides the student loan case, take United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 10:53 am
United States. [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 6:57 am
Indeed, Roberts relied heavily on Justice Robert Jackson’s concurring opinion in Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 9:30 am
For instance, the ATS was successfully invoked by a French privateer (an alien plaintiff) in Bolchos v. [read post]
