Search for: "Brown v Doe" Results 3041 - 3060 of 5,962
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am by John Elwood
  The Court denied cert. in one-time relist Brown v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 5:49 am by Joy Waltemath
” It affirmed a lower court’s grant of summary judgment to the New York City Department of Education on the mentor’s FLSA claims (Brown v New York City Department of Education, June 18, 2014, Raggi, R). [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
While it is rare for the Court to overrule a past decision that had recognized an individual right or limited state power—it is more common, as in Brown v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
Does that mean it had obligations before it had notice (bearing in mind that the “no general obligation to monitor” protection of Article 15 of the E-Commerce Directive does not apply)? [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:09 am by Amy Howe
Metzgar and Kellogg Brown & Root Services v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:54 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Dallas non-compete attorney Rob Radcliff on his Smooth Transitions Law Blog Two for Tuesdays: Takeaways from P3 – Legal marketing expert Lindsay Griffiths of International Lawyers Network on Zen & The Art of Legal Networking Newspaper Reports That Texas Accounts For 40% Of Nationwide Oil & Gas Related Deaths – Fort Worth lawyer John David Hart on his blog, the Oil & Gas Safety Advisor Social Media Class Actions Buy the Farm(Ville): Ninth Circuit Dismisses… [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 8:45 am by Lyle Denniston
   The cases are Kellogg Brown & Root Services v.Harris and KBR Inc., v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:43 am by John Elwood
  First up is Brown v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 6:00 am by Amy Howe
Metzgar and Kellogg, Brown & Root Services v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 5:03 am
My colleague Evan Tager (Mayer Brown’s Punitive Damages blog) has a very interesting post about the forthcoming Ninth Circuit en banc punitive damages case, Arizona v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 5:56 am
District Court for the District of New Jersey) (employee had reasonable expectation of privacy in password-protected work computer); Brown–Criscuolo v. [read post]