Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 3041 - 3060
of 34,277
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2022, 12:54 pm
From today's unanimous decision of the California Supreme Court in Serova v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 9:49 am
Weiner * Fair Use – It’s the Law (for what it’s worth)–Lenz v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Fulton v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 1:27 am
That is a nice complement to Epic Games v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 10:18 am
Parker (Economic Development; Tribal Law) Lower Brule Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
Sixty-three years later, in Gonzales v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 3:00 am
—Ringo Starr ___________________________________________________1Winston v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
The 1959 case of Bibb v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 1:38 pm
In addition, thanks to Roe v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 7:47 am
Jackson v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 6:24 am
At least some lower California courts have agreed, but in Martinez v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
The present doctrinal development begins with Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 1:03 pm
” The case is Williams v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 7:33 am
In Massachusetts v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Tandon v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 12:04 pm
” Hewitt v. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 6:31 am
The Ninth Circuit agreed with the California district court that Bacardi’s use of BACARDI UNTAMEABLE for rum did not as a matter of law infringe Lodestar’s UNTAMED mark for distilled spirits because no likelihood of confusion existed, given that consumers would encounter the marks differently in the marketplace, the marketing efforts were concentrated in different media, and no evidence of actual confusion existed. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 12:58 pm
City of Los Angeles, California 22-64Issues: (1) Whether Heck v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 12:01 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 10:43 am
Expanded to other characteristics such as voice, surroundings/lookalikes (White v. [read post]