Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 3041 - 3060
of 48,948
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2009, 4:17 pm
" Cushman v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 11:04 am
Perrault v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 7:05 am
" Atser Research Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 5:23 am
Many focus on a question that, I shall suggest after the jump, ought to be legally irrelevant -- whether baking a wedding cake is sufficiently "expressive" to qualify as "speech" the compulsion of which violates Wooley v. [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 3:14 am
Sections 168 and 169 of the 2015 Act substantially codify the common law principles concerning the courts’ powers relating to costs in civil proceedings (Word Perfect Translation v Minister for Public Expenditure & Reform (No 2) [2021] IESC 19 (24 March 2021) [4.2] (Clarke CJ; O’Donnell, MacMenamin, Dunne and O’Malley JJ concurring); in particular, section 169 provides for the traditional rule that costs follow the event. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:16 am
The FTT agreed with that analysis, finding: (1) There is a distinction between a liability to pay and a cost, as the Court of Appeal had explained in OM Property Management v Burr. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 3:30 am
Co., 728 S.E. 2d 234 (Ga. 2012).2Kieffer v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 7:17 am
In Milina v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 5:00 pm
The use of this procedure was highlighted in a recent Human Rights Tribunal decision, Abdul v York University. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 10:03 am
” In Tupper v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 10:00 am
In Filipinas v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 5:22 pm
” Rosen v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 3:56 pm
Entergy Corp. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 1:30 am
Not so said the Senior Costs Judge in Findley v Jones and MIB [2009] EWHC 90130 (Costs) (reaching the same conclusion as the judge in Puksis v Brumby [2008] EWHC 90095 (Costs)). [read post]
16 Aug 2009, 5:00 pm
Bell BCI Co., v. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 1:14 pm
NationsBank”, 939 S.W.2d 118 (Tex. 1996) and “Judice v. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 5:26 am
Interesting stuff is happening at the Appellate Division (First Department) these days, particularly when it comes to awarding a "prevailing party" legal fees, costs and disbursements.It has long been the "American rule," that in the absence of some regulation, contractual arrangement, or statutory entitlement to recover one's fees and costs within the context of litigation, each side bears its own costs. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
Onex Corporation v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 10:28 pm
In its decision, the court cited to Brockhouse v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 11:55 am
School district ordered to reimburse Medicare-eligible retirees enrolled in Medicare the cost of Medicare premiumsMatter of Bryant v Board of Educ., Chenango Forks Cent. [read post]
