Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 3041 - 3060
of 48,918
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Khan responded that the objective to avoid unnecessary costs remained in the Commission’s strategy. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
In Grace United Methodist Church Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 1:51 pm
The agency isn’t just risking the economic costs of a spectacularly overbroad rule and its own much-needed agency resources. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 10:00 am
., Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:08 am
This arose in the case of Pricol Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 7:04 am
required that the Papa-T furnish “at its own expense and cost all necessary labour”, and be responsible for the cost of its own office premises (including rent and utilities);b. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
Unfortunately, these days many employment contract termination (and other) provisions have a Waksdale problem and are invalid or at least open to challenge in the wake of Waksdale v Swegon North America 2020 ONCA 391. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 1:01 am
Howell v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:28 am
Wilkinson is Microsoft's renewed motion to dismiss: DeMartini et al. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 2:47 pm
Purcell v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:29 pm
Knick v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:29 pm
Knick v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 10:43 am
On April 10, in People of California v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 8:52 am
From Judge Carlton Reeves' decision today in Andreacchio v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 8:28 am
The notice of appeal contains: The case caption: Commonwealth v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 3:51 am
Will they still lie, as the cost of settling is relative to the cost of fooling their happily fooled audience to watch them night after night? [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:46 am
In this post, Jack Prytherch, Of Counsel in the Tax team at CMS, comments on the Supreme Court’s decision in Moulsdale t/a Moulsdale Properties v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2023] UKSC 12, which was handed down on 22 March 2023. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 12:45 am
It is superfluous for cases such as Ericsson v Apple, costly and lengthy for the litigants, and clogs the court system. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 7:07 pm
They could still identify Sisvel v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 2:01 pm
” The employee in Tuesday’s case, Gerald Groff, is asking the justices to overturn their 1977 decision in Trans World Airlines v. [read post]
