Search for: "D&S, Inc." Results 3041 - 3060 of 26,052
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2021, 9:09 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Effervescent, Inc., 2021 WL 4170997, No. 06-cv-00605-PAB-KMT, No. 16-cv-02004-PAB-KMT (D. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 9:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
AC2T, Inc., 2021 WL 4197176, No. 1:20-cv-04662-FB-PK (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 4:41 am by Peter J. Sluka
” Paragraph 10(d) of the settlement agreement stated that no transfer, sale, pledge, or encumbrance of Stile’s shares would be valid until the transferee agreed in writing to be bound by Stile’s stay away obligations. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 3:43 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
LLC CPAs  2020 NY Slip Op 34343(U) December 31, 2020 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 653044/2013 Judge: Robert D. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 3:41 am
See, e.g., In re USA Warriors Ice Hockey Program, Inc., 122 USPQ2d 1790 (TTAB 2017) (finding composite mark including the words USA WARRIORS ICE HOCKEY and NONE TOUGHER separated by a logo likely to cause confusion with composite mark including the words USA HOCKEY despite applicant’s prior registration of composite mark including the words USA WARRIORS ICE HOCKEY and NONE TOUGHER separated by a logo); In re Strategic Partners Inc., 102 USPQ2d 1397 (TTAB 2012)… [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 4:12 am by Merpel McKitten
”11 Nokia even noted that Qualcomm’s actions “induced third parties to invest in the implementation of that standard in good faith reliance upon Qualcomm’s commitments. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 6:56 am by IPWatchdog
Several other outlets have reported that either Leahy himself or sources on the Hill confirmed such a bill is in the works and will address discretionary denial practice at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) under the PTAB’s precedential Apple Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 6:56 am by IPWatchdog
Several other outlets have reported that either Leahy himself or sources on the Hill confirmed such a bill is in the works and will address discretionary denial practice at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) under the PTAB’s precedential Apple Inc. v. [read post]