Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V" Results 3041 - 3060 of 12,262
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2019, 7:00 am by Seamus Hughes, Devorah Margolin
Prior to the ruling, federal courts were able to prosecute individuals as young as 15 for material support, but in the wake of the Sessions v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 12:26 am
 It was common ground that the sector in question was the passenger car sector, and would require assessment through the eyes of average consumers, who would pay a high degree of attention (due to a passenger car being an important financial purchase).It was identified that the Defender designs had unusual aspects (“‘arrow shot' rear windows and alpine side windows”). [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 5:08 am by Eugene Volokh
Div. 2007) (approving an injunction insofar as it would remove existing websites and disapproving the injunction insofar as it would enjoin future publications); Doe v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 10:50 am by Phil Dixon
” Deputy: “I need you to be honest with me and I won’t take you to jail today. [read post]
2 Nov 2019, 8:47 am by Eric Goldman
Doe * Court Blasts “Copyright Troll” for Treating Courts “as an ATM”–Strike 3 v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 3:22 pm by Giles Peaker
Notting Hill Genesis, R (On the Application Of) v Camberwell Green Magistrates’ Court (2019) EWHC 1423 (Admin) I missed this at the time – May this year – I think because I was on hiatus. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 7:07 am by Richard Hunt
Gender issues and disability I learned about the October 22, 2019 decision in Doe v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:12 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Deferral of specifics of mitigation is proper “where the local agency commits itself to mitigation and lists the alternatives to be considered, analyzed and possibly incorporated into the mitigation plan” (quoting Defend the Bay v. [read post]