Search for: "Doe v. Choices, Inc." Results 3041 - 3060 of 3,249
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2023, 11:43 am by Patricia Hughes
Ontario (“Working Families I”) and Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Lina M. Khan
If Congress passes strong federal privacy legislation—as I hope it does—or if there is any other significant change in applicable law, then the Commission would be able to reassess the value-add of this effort and whether continuing it is a sound use of resources. [read post]
31 May 2022, 4:51 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
” Relying upon the doctrine of in pari delicto, which “bars a party that has been injured as a result of its own intentional wrongdoing from recovering for those injuries from another party whose equal or lesser fault contributed to the loss” (Rosenbach v Diversified Group, Inc., 85 AD3d 569 [1st Dept 2011]), Justice Crane ruled: Here, the evidence at trial demonstrated extensive wrongdoing on the part of Seibel. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 3:40 am by Peter Mahler
Five years after Kemp, in a case called Ingle v Glamore Motor Sales, Inc., the same court rejected a minority shareholder’s contention that his status as such exempted him from the at-will employment doctrine and allowed him to seek a remedy for wrongful termination of his employment. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 9:23 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Still, sole-sourcing its hosting services was a business choice Parler made. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
Although the demolition or renovation of a single-family residence is exempt from Asbestos NESHAP requirements, the exemption does not apply where the demolition is part of a larger commercial project. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am by SteinMcewen, LLP
Also, the defense is personal and does not extend to related entities and other locations. [read post]
Some have argued that, because the Nation’s approach to climate change is politically contested,[1] and since these matters affect major policy questions over which Congress has not granted the SEC new, explicit powers, the Commission lacks authority to require disclosure in this area.[2] For the reasons given below, the Commission should disregard these claims, focusing instead on the challenging policy choices that any finalization of the proposal would require. [read post]