Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court"
Results 3041 - 3060
of 8,633
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 3:48 pm
Weigman, Case # 30-2019-01066813, Orange County Superior Court [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 10:00 pm
See Order at p. 2 citing Hassel v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
Does CEQA Apply? [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 3:25 am
Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty., 480 U. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 3:42 am
In reaching its decision, the Supreme Court relied heavily on its judgment in Vedanta Resources PLC and Anor v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 9:33 am
Sandoz had been attempting to invalidate Leo's patent EP0679154 for calcipotriol monohydrate, which the patent claimed was "a new crystalline form of calcipotriol - with superior technical properties e.g. in the manufacture of crystal suspension formulations, and with superior stability properties". [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 5:25 am
” The CMCR noted that the mandate rule is a more powerful version of the law-of-the-case doctrine, in which a lower court does not have the authority to deviate from a superior appellate court’s mandate. [read post]
24 May 2012, 2:00 am
Superior Court, Cal. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 4:31 pm
Rippy v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 12:44 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 6:42 am
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania vacated the Superior Court’s ruling and remanded the case back to the Superior Court for reconsideration.[11] Perhaps most importantly, the Supreme Court rejected the Superior Court’s suggestion that the rule of capture does not apply to hydraulic fracturing due to the fact that hydraulic fracturing is an artificial means to stimulate production. [read post]
18 May 2015, 11:10 am
In a recent products liability/workplace injury case, Elsheref v. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 4:00 am
Provincial superior courts recognized by s. 96 “have always occupied a position of prime importance in the constitutional pattern of this country”, and the Federal Court, by contrast, “has only the jurisdiction conferred by statute”, and being a statutory court, created under the constitutional authority of s. 101, does not have inherent jurisdiction (emphasis in original). [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 7:42 am
Superior Court, 224 Cal. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 1:22 pm
Superior Court (Ossakow) S165906. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
Ontario (Safety, Licensing Appeals and Standards Tribunals), 2019 ONCA 518 [15] The Divisional Court accepted that an adjudicator’s discussion of a draft decision with colleagues does not in and of itself breach the rules of natural justice. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 7:00 am
One such case is presented in RealPro, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 3:25 pm
The Ontario Court of Appeal in Hopkins v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 10:51 pm
State v. [read post]
