Search for: "Does 1 through 5" Results 3041 - 3060 of 24,643
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2019, 10:12 am by Patricia Hughes
I never make “New Year’s resolutions” — I’m too old to think that they will come to fruition — but I have decided to identify five “wishes’ I have for Ontario and Canada more broadly in 2019: 1. stop all the studies and take action re A2J; 2. provide lessons to the premier about what the rule of law means; 3. allow advance directives for medically assisted deaths; 4. don’t diminish existing protection for children and youth; 5.… [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 12:43 pm
Does a scheme establish 'fair compensation' for the purposes of Article 5(2)(b) of Directive 2001/29/EC if the right specified in Question 1(a) applies only where recording media are marketed to natural persons who use the recording media to make reproductions for private purposes? [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 7:15 pm
  In what world does that make any sense? [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 5:00 am
Therefore, your communication with us through this forum will not be considered as privileged or confidential. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:26 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Paper 1: Jessica Silbey, “IP at Work: The Roles of Law in Creativity and Innovation, Chapter 5: Reputation” Interviews with creative professionals/facilitators. [read post]
21 Oct 2017, 9:00 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Id.Five Factors of the Daubert Test of Admissibility in FloridaIn Daubert, the Court referenced five factors courts could use to determine the reliability of expert scientific testimony: (1) whether the expert’s theory or technique can be (and has been) tested; (2) whether the theory or technique has been subjected to peer review and publication; (3) the known or potential rate of error; (4) the existence and maintenance of standards controlling the… [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
What continues to puzzle me is (1) did the IRS issue a Form 1099 to Mr. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 11:57 am by Thomas Surmanski
Similarly, it does not address replica, prohibited, or antique firearms. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 11:57 am by Thomas Surmanski
Similarly, it does not address replica, prohibited, or antique firearms. [read post]