Search for: "Does 1-51" Results 3041 - 3060 of 3,960
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2011, 6:56 pm
Mining Co., 126 F. 1, 27 (9th Cir. 1903) ("Where a court sitting in equity allows a jury trial, the verdict is but advisory to the court, and in no sense binding. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:26 pm by Eric
There are 1 trillion documents on web, 1 billion searches/day, and 1 million new spam pages created every day. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 12:58 pm by Jim Gerl
Fairfax County Sch Bd 553 F.3d 315, 51 IDELR 148 (4th Cir 1/14/09).Related articlesBack To The Future: Special Education Law 101 (specialeducationlawblog.blogspot.com) Does FAPE trump LRE? [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 8:07 am by Hedge Fund Lawyer
[BM to update the votes] **** Family Office Definition 11:51 AM ET: CS providing background on family offices and proposed definition. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 4:05 pm
Wrongful death lawsuits in Georgia may be maintained primarily by three different persons or groups: (1) surviving spouse or children, O.C.G.A. § 51-4-2 (2) parents, O.C.G.A. § 51-4-4 and (3) the decedent's personal representative. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 11:47 am by Aaron Pelley
Tapia was convicted of smuggling unauthorized aliens into the United States, and the District Court, in imposing a 51-month prison term, noted its belief that Ms. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 11:48 am by lawmrh
For violating drug court rules, Lindsey not only does jail terms of 51 days, 90 days and 104 days, Judge Williams sends her on what she calls an “indefinite sentence,” where she did not specify when Lindsey would get out. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 5:51 am by Lawrence Taylor
Does all of this finally solve the drunk driving problem? [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 4:35 pm by Zachary Spilman
However, the brief is remarkable for a number of reasons (that begin with the impressive list of defendants;  any group that includes Donald Rumsfeld, Peter Pace, and “John Does 1-100? [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:58 pm
" The applicable standard of the Eighth Circuit, in which this case arose, does not differ. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
There is no indication justifying a different assessment, either.[2.4] Thus the main request does not fulfil the requirement of clear allowability. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
This means that the exact logic applied by the Board to the case above would not operate because R 137 as applicable today does not refer to a first communication any more.Does this mean that the situation is completely different today? [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 9:00 pm
So when does a temporary tax cut effectively become permanent law? [read post]