Search for: "Does 1-54"
Results 3041 - 3060
of 3,413
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2009, 4:12 pm
The Opposition Division (OD) came to the conclusion that Claim 1 of the auxiliary request was novel over the A 54(3) document D8 because the skilled person had to make several selections in order to arrive at the claimed subject-matter. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 9:00 pm
June 1, 2007). [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 3:12 pm
Of the 670 prisoners on death row, only 1, Scott Peterson, has retained counsel. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 10:31 pm
That is far below the 56 pounds for #1 corn or 54 pounds for #2 corn. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 6:01 am
"At the very same time Pfizer was in our office negotiating and resolving the allegations of criminal conduct in 2004, Pfizer was itself in its other operations violating those very same laws," Loucks, 54, says. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 2:01 pm
Redmond, 54 F.3d 1262, 1270 (7th Cir. 1995). [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 7:39 am
For a complete list of exemptions, see Idaho Code § 54-5205. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 4:45 pm
Although this observation is correct in itself, it does not lead to the conclusion that the disclaimer necessarily fails for this reason to comply with A 123(2). [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 7:00 am
References: 1 Hepp, N. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 9:05 am
So what about the other 28% that have this tier 1 graduate as their mascot? [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 3:41 am
Vinar does not succeed on summary judgment, and is held in the case for a portion of the third party claims. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 7:00 pm
A sports spectator assumes similar risks as does a sports participant. [35] Courts usually conclude that a “spectator has a duty to protect himself or herself not only against the dangers of which he or she has actual knowledge but also against such dangers incident to the game as would be apparent to a reasonable person in the exercise of due care. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 4:43 pm
When the Enlarged Board decided, in G 1/03, that disclaimers did not violate A 123(2), many practitioners were greatly relieved. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 5:25 pm
In the present case, moreover, for the reasons given the remaining piece of evidence relied upon (D6) leads to the conclusion that the subject-matter of comparative example 4 of D1 does not anticipate the subject-matter of operative claim 1. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 9:16 pm
CLEBC is a non-profit society and does not receive any funding for operations. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 1:48 pm
 Id. at 54-58. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 11:29 pm
The definition of #2 yellow corn requires that a volumetric bushel be 54 lbs. in weight. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 5:13 pm
He/she would therefore conclude that the value of 1% should in fact read 5%. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 11:25 pm
Nafziger does not anticipate much of a problem with stalk quality in connection with an early freeze. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 5:29 pm
[…]The following questions should be referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeals (EBA) : (1) Does the skilled person have a mother tongue ? [read post]
