Search for: "Fell v. Fell" Results 3041 - 3060 of 12,741
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2012, 4:44 am by David J. DePaolo
Erie asserted a wrinkle in Virginia law that was intended to provide a presumption in favor of injured workers who can't testify about how their injury occurred.In Florida the 1st District Court of Appeals (DCA) reversed a Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) decision that denied the claim of a worker who fell from a ladder and could not testify about how the fall happened.In Caputo v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 1:17 am by Ayesha Christie, Matrix
Readers interested in immigration cases involving mental and physical health must also read the recent ECtHR Grand Chamber judgment in Paposhvili v Belgium (App No. 41738/10), 13 Dec 2016, which transforms the Article 3 case law in relation to the removal of seriously ill persons, and departs from the long-standing and highly restrictive approach in N v UK (App No. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 4:24 am by Matthew Perry, Olswang LLP
He also considered the two Privy Council decisions of BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings [1997] UKPC 13  and Attorney General of Belize v Belize Telecom Ltd [2009] UKPC 10, the effects of which meant that to imply a term, it must be reasonable and equitable, be necessary to give business efficacy to the contract and effectively be a term that ‘goes without saying’. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 10:51 am
New Maryland Slip and Fall Law Three years ago, after the Maryland Court of Appeals denied certiorari in Allen v. [read post]