Search for: "Felts v. State"
Results 3041 - 3060
of 5,752
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2015, 7:07 am
At issue in the new case, Friedman v. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 10:51 am
See State ex. rel Reitter Stucco, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 2:42 pm
See Hasko v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 6:08 am
820 A.2d 546, 547-48 (D.C. 2003)(citing United States v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:00 pm
She testified that Individual-1 arrived to her home and that she felt unwell after drinking a juice that he served her. [read post]
29 May 2024, 9:01 pm
In the 2014 Noel Canning v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 3:34 pm
In 2007, Mr Justice Pumfrey tried to do away with disclosure on obviousness in Nichia v Argos. [read post]
5 Oct 2006, 6:17 pm
. conclusions" of the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Consequently, The Gambia felt compelled to bring proceedings at the ICJ, seeking to restrain and redress the violence that Rohingyas endured in Myanmar, following China’s and Russia’s use of their veto to block any solution at the Security Council. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 6:18 am
Supreme Court decision given in Jun 2014 in the case of Alice v CLS, which arguably makes it more difficult to obtain business method patents. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 2:43 pm
Late on Wednesday by local (California) time, United States Magistrate Judge Paul S. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 11:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 8:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 7:20 pm
(Silberman v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 4:59 am
After Microsoft felt forced for procedural reasons to add Google Inc. to a German patent infringement action originally brought only against its Motorola Mobility subsidiary, a Microsoft v. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 5:15 pm
Shannon discussed the Holder v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 10:20 am
Background: On May 2, 2014, the Federal Court of Appeal released its long-awaited decision in the case of Johnstone v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 1:54 am
This is the case of the UK, where the relevant provision is s.1(1) of the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988, which so states: "Copyright is a property right which subsists ... in the following descriptions of work— (a) original literary, dramatic, musical or artistic works, (b) sound recordings, films or broadcasts, and (c) the typographical arrangement of published editions." [read post]
23 May 2013, 12:43 pm
There was a famous case called Maddox v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 7:43 am
In the matter of Jose Osorio Lozado v. [read post]
