Search for: "Files v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" Results 3041 - 3060 of 3,767
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2014, 11:03 am by Brian E. Barreira
In the case of Walker, the offending language was: “The Trustee is prohibited from spending sums of interest or principal to [Walker] for her benefit for services which are otherwise available under any public entitlement program of the United States of America, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, or any political subdivision thereof. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:03 am by Brian E. Barreira
In the case of Walker, the offending language was: “The Trustee is prohibited from spending sums of interest or principal to [Walker] for her benefit for services which are otherwise available under any public entitlement program of the United States of America, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, or any political subdivision thereof. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
: (IPEG),EU CORDIS launches a new web service for joint research initiatives: (IPR Helpdesk),EC announces plan to create single, EU-wide market for online music, films, and video games: (Ars Technica)GermanyGermans shun patents, but press for patent valuation ISO: (IPKat)Hong KongCreative commons Hong Kong begins public discussion (Creativecommons.com)IndiaBlawging our way to the front pages of Business Standard: (Spicy IP),Bootleg baloney: It's music to… [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am by Marie Louise
(The IP Factor)   Japan Japan to sign ACTA this weekend (Michael Geist)   Poland A letter of consent and something more (Class 46)   South East Asia Patent protection in the ASEAN region (Foreign Filing Blog)   Switzerland Acquiescence not a factor in opposition proceedings (Class 46)   United Kingdom Copyright in court judgments: a matter of access (1709 Copyright Blog) SuperGroup: Fashion, recession and IP (IPKat) Damages cap now in place (PatLit) PCC… [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 6:59 am by Orin Kerr
McCarthy is right that the United States was not formally at war with Britain at that time. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 6:02 pm by Larry Ribstein
J. 857, 870-73 (2009); United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 9:08 pm
YouTube, Inc., No. 07-CV-2103 (S.D.N.Y. filed March 13, 2007); Capitol Records, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
Porsche AG: (Class 46), WIPO: Yell Limited v Yell.travel: domain name yell.travel to be transferred to Yell Limited: (Class 46), Some see rise in non-traditional trade marks; national registries not yet: (Intellectual Property Watch)   Global - Patents Lower patentability standards – strategic responses: (IP Thinktank), IP Business Congress sees Finnish inventor become a millionaire: (IAM), Ron Slusky: Five prescriptions for effectively analysing an invention and then… [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 9:53 am by Eugene Volokh
And the United States Supreme Court has already—unanimously—held that an economic boycott based on race, namely a boycott of white-owned businesses, is a constitutionally protected form of protest. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 2:19 am by SHG
To the extent there's a saving grace, it's that even border searches must be reasonable, though up to now, the operative law treats computers like any other sealed container and considers a search of a laptop to be routine, per the 1985 Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:26 am by SHG
The Supreme Court of the United States is a co-equal branch of government. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 8:54 am by Thomas & Pearl
This is true in United States law—and also in the French legal system. [read post]