Search for: "Good v. Good"
Results 3041 - 3060
of 76,287
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2010, 3:47 pm
., v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 3:48 am
FTC v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 11:32 am
Copyright Attorney fees The prevailing party in a copyright action was properly awarded attorney fees, although the suit was filed in good faith. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 5:28 am
For one of the finest oral arguments of our time, and a very good thing for National NALSA moot court competitors to hear as they prep for the competition a few weeks away, check out Bill Rice arguing before the Supreme Court, beginning at about 34:20: Here. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 12:57 pm
Kipp.That's the good news.Here's the bad news. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 12:21 pm
That's not a good quality in you. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:25 pm
This is a definite "I've got some good news and some bad news for you" type of case, at least for the underlying lawyer, Perry Smith.The good news is that he represents the plaintiff and wins the underlying lawsuit, as well as gets awarded attorney's fees. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:13 am
Sounds good so far, but why is the case in NY? [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:41 pm
In New York v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 4:41 pm
Tidbits from Google v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 8:38 am
Amirsaleh v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 11:16 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 9:00 am
The first is that probably the four highest profile design cases in the UK in recent years (Procter & Gamble Co v Reckitt Benckiser (UK) Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 936, Dyson v Vax [2011] EWCA Civ 1206, Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd v Apple Inc [2012] EWCA Civ 1339, and PMS International Limited v Magmatic Limited [2016] UKSC 12 (i.e. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:29 pm
Matter of Woodland Community Association v Planning Board of Town of Shandaken This article 78 appeal was brought against a judgment dismissing petitioners’ application to review a determination of respondent Planning Board of the Town of Shandaken granting respondent Good Water Corporation’s application for site plan approval and a special use permit. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:00 am
R v Albert, 2016 NBQB 154. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 8:30 am
Case citation: Hawkins v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 10:51 am
As such, the Board of Appeal had wrongly considered a connection between the goods, on the basis that they might be mixed. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 6:15 am
Supreme Court decisions mean that Amaro “is no longer good law. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 12:30 pm
Benson and Parker v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 6:19 am
Anyhow, congratulations, and good luck with bar review coming up.btw- any comments from 3Ls re PMBR v BarBri, etc? [read post]
