Search for: "IN RE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF DECISIONS"
Results 3041 - 3060
of 7,539
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2009, 1:00 pm
The main petitioner is a government official, and the respondent is an "injured" party arguing unconstitutionality. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
And they failed to use Trump era cases against the decision, but not for lack of trying (e.g. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 12:37 pm
Susan Allen, USPTO: Not official views. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 4:07 am
National Public Radio - http://rs6.net/tn.jsp? [read post]
29 May 2017, 6:58 am
The problem with the story is that it re-writes legislative history. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:48 pm
The committees’ investigation drew on thousands of documents, written statements of more than 50 Capitol Police officers, and interviews with current and former congressional security officials, executive branch officials and members of the D.C. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 7:06 am
"If you're talking about the most expensive units, those are mostly TDCJ's older facilities which tend to have higher costs-per-prisoner. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 10:35 am
You’re very special. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 12:12 pm
{Before her parents arrived, Plaintiff began to provide school officials with a handwritten statement. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 2:33 pm
It is unacceptable for him to be blabbering with unfactual information, which is confusing the general public. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 4:21 pm
I think there are many First Amendment problems with the North Carolina Supreme Court decision, and the petition for Supreme Court review filed in this case (Packingham v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:43 pm
The 2004 decision should have been left to park biologists and horticulturists, who had advised against the deal on federally protected land, and should have been opened to public debate, the report says. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:43 pm
The 2004 decision should have been left to park biologists and horticulturists, who had advised against the deal on federally protected land, and should have been opened to public debate, the report says. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 7:00 am
Later, it once again re-emerged in early 2018 with an organization that still awaits official recognition from al-Qaeda’s leadership. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:21 am
A second instance decision is “re-examination” and not examination, as also indicated in Opinion #00016/2023/CGPI/PFE-INPI/PGF/AGU – published in BRPTO´s Official gazette #2762 on December 12, 2023 – when addressing formal issues to administrative appeals. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 8:02 am
We’re saving EU legal research for next week. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 6:46 am
The women who run the shelters rightly see the MoWA legislation as an insulting provision that will re-victimise women. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 8:57 am
Plus, you're right about persistent URLs. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 2:59 am
These are policy decisions. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 10:52 pm
” On Friday, a group of prominent legal scholars and officials from the Society for the Rule of Law urged the court via an amicus brief to reject Trump’s claim, stating, “The last thing presidential immunity should do is embolden Presidents who lose re-election to engage in criminal conduct, through official acts or otherwise. [read post]
