Search for: "In Re: Mark M." Results 3041 - 3060 of 7,664
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2015, 8:31 am
Later in the same Reddit AMA, Snowden makes the point more directly about where the important changes are happening: [M]any of the changes that are happening are invisible because they’re happening at the engineering level. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 7:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  See above re: good/bad arguments.http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default? [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 3:28 am by Gritsforbreakfast
See the hearing video here; it's the second bill up at the 3:35 mark.) [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 12:56 pm
 That was going to clearly harm (e.g., put burn marks) on the floor. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Tim Sitzmann
After the show’s success, I’m guessing they’re all-in. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:35 am by SHG
I’m just a low-level in-house lawyer. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:48 am
In re Matthew Beck, Serial No. 85767380 (March 19, 2015) [precedential].Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act prohibits registration of a mark consisting of matter which may disparage, inter alia, “persons,” “institutions,” or “beliefs. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 2:46 pm by Michael
For what it’s worth, I’m also giving Gracepoint a bash – the bizarre and spectacularly bad remake of Broadchurch, re-engineered to be spoon-fed to American audiences. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 8:43 am
I'm not much of a sports person, though I have gone to a few baseball games in my life — including seeing Mark Fidrych at Tiger Stadium in 1976. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 4:41 am by David DePaolo
“We are going to continue to spend money in increasingly inefficient ways and if we don’t focus on quality and outcomes, we’re lost. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
I’m not sure the public, however, sees it that way. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 8:27 pm by Jeff Gamso
 They aren't things that can be earned, they're not about what's deserved. [read post]