Search for: "J. C." Results 3041 - 3060 of 19,473
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2014, 4:08 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
André Felix, director digital de Mood/TBWA Brasil Recientemente conversaba con unos amigos abogados, unos jóvenes y otros no tanto y les preguntaba cómo consiguen a sus clientes. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 7:10 am by admin
    Under this program, holders of B, J-2, H-4, L-2, C, D visa holders, in addition to children under 7 years of age and elderly applicants over 80 years of age could have their in-person interview waived. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 8:09 pm by Patti Waller
Calder L, Simmons G, Thornley C, Taylor P, Pritchard K, Greening G, Bishop J. (2003). [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 6:31 pm by Denis Stearns
Calder L, Simmons G, Thornley C, Taylor P, Pritchard K, Greening G, Bishop J. (2003). [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 7:05 pm
Here are the articles published in Volume 38, Issue 2 of Environmental Law Review, complete with links to the abstracts and full-text articles: Introduction Environmental Justice: Making It A Reality by Morgan J. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 2:37 am by Dave
Following hard on the heels of J’s excellent post on the Immigration Bill, we now have further discussion of the EU right to reside rules by the CJEU in Jobcenter Berlin Neukolln v Alimanovic  Case C-67/14 (to which I might say, good luck landlords). [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:50 am by Joanna Buckley, Matrix.
It declined to follow Mitting J in SS v Secretary of State for the Home Department (SC/56/2009, 30 July 2010) that the observations in KJ were per incuriam. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 9:06 am by John Stigi and Alejandro Moreno
July 15, 2022) (Jacobs, J.), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit declined to impose “scheme liability” under subsections (a) and (c) of the Securities & Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5 (17 C.F.R. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 6:45 am by Garry J. Wise, Wise Law Office, Toronto
Canadian Press reports on the legal community's reaction to Bill C-232, an Act to require that all future Supreme Court nominees be functionally bilingual:Reviews from the legal community are scathing. [read post]