Search for: "LAWS v. DAVIS" Results 3041 - 3060 of 6,273
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2014, 7:06 am by Barbara Bavis
Saint- Gérard attributes this theory to American botanist Wade Davis). [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 4:31 am by Amy Howe
 Next week the Court resumes oral arguments, starting with Zivotofsky v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 10:57 am by Benjamin Bissell
In an opinion at CNN, Clark Jones argues that the country’s tough new terror laws could backfire. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 3:45 pm by Giles Peaker
(Finally) AA v London Borough of Southwark [2014] EWHC 500 (QB) This High Court judgment is remarkable in many ways, most of them worrying. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Levin, Rethinking Religious Minorities' Political Power, (48 UC Davis Law Review, 2015 Forthcoming).Claudia E. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 8:51 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The style of the case is, Twin City Fire Insurance Company v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 8:21 pm
Lee — Davis LLP, VancouverSolicitor-Client Privilege—What Does that Mean in Estate Litigationhow to secure a lawyer’s file in estate litigationwho holds the privilege and who can waive itwhat attack can be made when the file is releasedScott Cordell — Killam Cordell Murray, VancouverNetworking Lunch Rectification of Trusts and Willshow can applications for rectification be madethe applicable law—when it works and… [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 4:41 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
"Florida Supreme Court's Ruling"We further hold that under the circumstances of this case in which there was no warrant, court order, or binding appellate precedent authorizing real time cell site location tracking upon which the officers could have reasonably relied, the “good faith” exception to the exclusionary rule for “objectively reasonable law enforcement activity” set forth by the Supreme Court in Davis v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 3:20 pm by Goldstein, Bachman & Newman, LLP
However, the court said both Madison and Davis had genuine questions of law, and both sides were reasonable in believing they were right. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:38 pm by Donald Thompson
 This duty of fair dealing encompasses an obligation to ensure fairness in grand jury submissions (People v Pelchat, supra; People v Jordan, 153 AD2d 263 [2nd Dept 1990]; People v Russo, 128 Misc2d 876, 880 [Co Ct Suffolk Co 1985]), which includes notice of the grand jury proceedings that gives a defendant a reasonable opportunity to exercise his right to testify, not mere technical compliance with minimum statutory notice requirements (People v… [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 8:07 am by Guest Blogger
”  Note that this latter version of “bad intent” was not the sort addressed by Arlington Heights or Washington v. [read post]