Search for: "Liability and Insurers for each Defendant"
Results 3041 - 3060
of 3,441
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2010, 7:09 am
I hope they have really good insurance. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 4:00 pm
The excise tax amount triggered is generally $100 per individual for each day of noncompliance. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:00 am
Searches must be conducted at each relevant courthouse, and there are over 10,000 courthouses in America. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 9:33 pm
And: to extent that insurance companies engage in anticompetitive collusion, however, then they appropriately would be subject to antitrust liability. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 1:53 am
Among other things, the SEC settlement and the NYAG’s lawsuit announcement were not in isolation from each other. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 6:00 am
Each member could be sued and there will be no insurance to defend them or to pay any judgment. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 7:00 am
As a partner of Deloitte, Flanagan was required to sign a Memorandum of Agreement with each of the Partnerships (“MOAs”) setting forth his rights and obligations as a fiduciary. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 3:33 pm
Use of law firms selected by the client/carrier to defend appropriate cases. 2. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 7:21 am
In this case, Employers Mutual Casualty Company (EMC) and the others issued commercial general liability insurance policies to Lacy Masonry, Inc. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 6:00 am
Judge Baer thus considered whether plaintiffs had adequately alleged alter ego liability or an agency theory to keep the two non-signatory defendants in the case. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 2:22 pm
Under each of its subcontract agreements, CFM required NF Construction and International Decorators to name CFM as an additional insured on their respective general liability policies. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 8:05 am
The claim was brought directly against M Krass’ third party liability insurer. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm
These groups, of course, consist of corporations that are frequent defendants in asbestos litigation, and insurance carriers responsible for their liabilities. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 11:20 am
Takeaway Point: Make sure liability disclaimer and denial letters are specifically addressed to each and every insured to whom or which coverage is being denied, even if all insureds are related and located at the same mailing address. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 4:31 am
Beginning in 1975, the legislature started to chip away at that doctrine – the “collateral source rule” - and each evolving diminution of the doctrine was intended to prevent double recovery by plaintiffs and to curb rising liability insurance costs. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 7:27 am
Well established law in Texas is as follows: In liability insurance policies generally, an insurer assumes both the duty to indemnify the insured, that is, to pay all covered claims and judgments against an insured, and the duty to defend any lawsuit brought against the insured that alleges and seeks damages for an event "potentially" covered by the policy, even if groundless, false or fraudulent. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
An experienced construction litigator will help your company understand your exposure, and will help best position your company to defend Chinese Drywall claims and avoid liability. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 1:58 am
" The involvement of criminal charges against so many individual defendants raises many questions, including whether or to what extent D&O insurance might respond in these circumstances. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 7:55 am
Accusing BSBGFM&N of attempting to "play for another side", the provider PC defendants argued that the "Mallela defense" is available only to insurance carriers as a statutory defense arising out of a claimant's failure to comply with applicable sections of Business Corporation Law, Limited Liability Law and Educational Laws and that there are no reported cases where such a defense against a claim for legal malpractice was deemed valid by a… [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 6:28 pm
Weekly D156aInsurance -- Health insurance -- Compromise verdict -- Jury verdict finding that defendant health insurer breached contract but awarding zero damages was not a compromise verdict requiring a new trial where jury could have reasonably concluded that plaintiff sustained zero damagesReported at 35 Fla. [read post]
