Search for: "MATTER OF M W" Results 3041 - 3060 of 3,674
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2019, 8:04 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
  The notice to employers states: You reported X# employee names and Social Security numbers (SSN) on the Wage and Tax Statements (Forms W-2) for tax year xxxx that do not match our records. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 2:14 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
I’m constantly asked if I can recommend the perfect tax preparer. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
[Opponent’s] argument, that claim 1 refers to an essentially biological process for the protection of plants which is excluded from patentability according to A 53(b), must therefore fail.[6] For the following consideration of the requirements of A 53(b), the board has to draw the parties’ attention to the exact wording of this Article, which reads:“European patents shall not be granted in respect of:(b) plant or animal varieties or essentially biological processes for the… [read post]
16 May 2019, 8:04 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
  The notice to employers states: You reported X# employee names and Social Security numbers (SSN) on the Wage and Tax Statements (Forms W-2) for tax year xxxx that do not match our records. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 10:02 am by Eugene Volokh
For an answer, we can look at Ex parte Rick Perry, a 2016 case from Texas's high court for criminal matters. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 5:19 am by Eugene Volokh
[Under Islamic law, w]ives have no right to pronounce the talaq [which would cause a divorce]. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 6:01 am by Frank Pasquale
Well, whatever might be said theoretically on the matter, practically speaking, the leaders decide. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm by Adam Thierer
One much-discussed proposal would create a “public interest voucher” or what Robert W. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:09 am by Rebecca Tushnet
(I’m not sure this is a satisfactory answer. [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:28 pm by Marty Lederman
CARNEY: Well, let me address that question and I'll-forgive me, I'm going to read so I'm very precise here. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm by John Dean
” To honor this Constitutional requirement, Congress has enacted a law requiring the following oath: “I [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which… [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 3:20 am by INFORRM
This might sound like a matter of just inserting some standard text into directions orders for hearings, but it may be a bit more involved than that. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
You can't let a state court have the final say on important federal matters like the Natural Gas Act. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
" The court dismissed Favre's libel claim on the grounds that Sharpe's comments were, as a matter of law, "mere rhetorical hyperbole": The dispositive question here is whether a reasonable factfinder could conclude that the statements Sharpe made on the air would imply an assertion that Favre actually stole money from the poor. [read post]