Search for: "Martin v. State" Results 3041 - 3060 of 4,121
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2011, 11:38 am by Jennifer Lipinski
Carter **Jennifer Lipinski is a law student at Michigan State University. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 10:30 am by Kent Scheidegger
This is precisely what Justice Clarence Thomas was criticizing when he wrote for the majority Holder v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 9:14 am
“Had the appellant recognized that his conduct, especially regarding the sale of the property to his wife, was seriously improper and unprofessional, the sanction might well have been a suspension because the panel would not likely have had the concerns it expressed about future protection of the public,” Justice Martin Freedman wrote in Smith v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Betty Lupinacci
Jim Martin and I will be doing the heavy lifting for this task, but hope to have some of our colleagues join in the fun. [read post]
7 May 2007, 8:50 am
A unanimous panel of the Appellate Division, 2nd Department, ruling in Cunha v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am by William Banks
” Although the terms of the Insurrection Act suggested that the militias would be federalized when civilian authorities were overwhelmed, in 1827 the Supreme Court indicated, in a case called Martin v. [read post]
8 May 2010, 8:53 am by INFORRM
The Legal Satyricon blog has a post about United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in Murphy v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 7:55 am
The Coordinator met with Title V, Medicaid, the DD Council, ICC, state legislators and Iowa's congressional delegation, as well as representing our children with other parent, disability and child advocacy organizations. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 10:25 am by William Gould
On Wednesday, the Court heard oral arguments in Unite Here Local 355 v Mulhall, in which the Justices are considering whether a so-called neutrality agreement between a union and employer is a thing of “value” within the meaning of Section 302 of the NLRA and thus prohibited as a felony. [read post]